If lead experiences a radio failure after the VFR entry point, what happens to the lead?

If lead experiences a radio failure after the VFR entry point, what happens to the lead?

• A. A lead change will be conducted immediately
• B. Wing will inform approach and tower and request ALDIS lamps
• C. The flight will abort the mission
• D. Lead must fix the radio before proceeding

Answer: (B)

When a lead experiences a radio failure after the Visual Flight Rules (VFR) entry point, the correct course of action is for the wing to inform approach and tower and request ALDIS lamps. This procedure ensures that the lead, who may no longer be able to communicate effectively, can still receive guidance and instructions visually from the control tower. Using ALDIS lamps allows for non-verbal communication from air traffic control, which is crucial in maintaining safety and ensuring the flight can continue to navigate appropriately despite the lead’s communication breakdown. In this situation, lead’s inability to communicate doesn’t necessarily halt the mission but requires other measures to maintain operational safety and coordination. The other options do not correctly address the protocol for handling a radio failure in this scenario, focusing instead on actions that would either disrupt the mission unnecessarily or overlook the established procedures for non-verbal communication in aviation.

When a lead experiences a radio failure after the Visual Flight Rules (VFR) entry point, the correct course of action is for the wing to inform approach and tower and request ALDIS lamps. This procedure ensures that the lead, who may no longer be able to communicate effectively, can still receive guidance and instructions visually from the control tower.

Using ALDIS lamps allows for non-verbal communication from air traffic control, which is crucial in maintaining safety and ensuring the flight can continue to navigate appropriately despite the lead’s communication breakdown. In this situation, lead’s inability to communicate doesn’t necessarily halt the mission but requires other measures to maintain operational safety and coordination.

The other options do not correctly address the protocol for handling a radio failure in this scenario, focusing instead on actions that would either disrupt the mission unnecessarily or overlook the established procedures for non-verbal communication in aviation.